CUBAN MEDICAL RESEARCH Breast Cancer Risk in Cuba
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Age group |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
98-200 |
||||
No |
Rate |
No |
Rate |
No |
Rate |
No |
Rate |
|
Under 30 years |
23 |
0.91 |
19 |
0.76 |
19 |
0.79 |
20 |
0.80 |
30 – 49 years |
584 |
35.0 |
627 |
36.6 |
580 |
32.3 |
597 |
34.8 |
50 – 64 years |
769 |
98.3 |
822 |
102.5 |
790 |
95.1 |
794 |
99.0 |
65 years or older |
786 |
151.9 |
835 |
158.0 |
781 |
138.0 |
801 |
151.5 |
Total |
2 192 |
39.3 |
2 303 |
41.5 |
2 170 |
38.8 |
2 222 |
40.0 |
Adjusted rate 1 |
|
31.6 |
|
34.4 |
|
31.4 |
|
32.4 |
1 to the world population
Figure 1 shows the distribution of crude and adjusted incidence rates of breast cancer over time, as well as adjusted mortality rates. There is an increasing trend in incidence for both rates (p <0.05), with a 2% (95% RI, 1.5-2.7) annual average change for crude rates, and 0.9% (95% RI, 0.4-1.4) for adjusted rates. A decline in rates was observed between 1993 and 1995. Mortality has remained stable, with a 0.06 tendency (95% RI, -0.01; 1.37), with a minimum value of 13.6 and a maximum of 18.0 for 1977-2000.
Figure 1: Crude and adjusted incidence rates of breast cancer in Cuba (1977-2000)

The largest risk of developing breast cancer in Cuba in the 1998-2000 period was observed in Havana City, followed by Villa Clara and Matanzas Provinces, where 30% of cases were diagnosed. The risk is less than 20 per100 000 women in the provinces of Las Tunas and Guantanamo, but the mortality incidence ratio is higher than 70%. The truncated rate between 35 and 64 years of age was 71.6 per 100 000 women in the 1998-2000 period.
The risk of death is higher for Havana City and the eastern provinces.
Figure 3:Geographical distribution of Breast Cancer Incidence, Cuba (1998-2000)

Discussion
The existence of a National Cancer Registry in Cuba, created in 1964, has made it possible to estimate breast cancer risk for Cuban women by age and geographical region, and to follow the behavior of the condition over time. Risk increases with time, mainly attributable to the 60-or-older group. This pattern is repeated worldwide, where about 75% of breast cancer cases are diagnosed in women over 50 4 . A slight stability can be found in breast cancer incidence in women around 50, which can be associated with the appearance of menopause.
The fact that a large number of Cuban women either work or study, and have become active in society over the last 40 years, results in a change towards more Westernized life styles. Urbanization increased in Cuba from 73.9% in 1990 to 75.2% in 2000 4, and though the relationship between health and urbanization is complex, it is undeniable that these elements are closely connected. Health improvement brought about by such beneficial effects of urbanization as sanitation, electrification and a greater availability and accessibility of health services, is associated, as a rule, with lifestyle modifications which are determinants of cancer risk. Epidemiological research reveals a positive relationship between breast cancer and socioeconomic factors 4. Such reproductive factors as nulliparity, small number of children, late childbirth, late menopause, and to a lesser degree, diet 5,6, can be held partially responsible for this positive association, since these characteristics are more commonly found in women with a higher socioeconomic status. All these factors partly account for the breast cancer increase found in Cuba.
It is clear that increases in rates of the disease parallel increases in industrialization, mainly in those areas where rates were low. The annual increase worldwide is estimated to average 0.5%, which means that there will be 1.25 million new cases in 2010 1. The percentage of increase is higher in Cuba (0.9%), which means 2 378 new cases should appear 2010. Breast cancer risk increased for Cuban woman, from 24.4 new cases per 100 000 in 1977, to 31.4 in 2000. This increase is similar in other developing countries where tendency studies have been carried out 4. A 1% annual increase is reported in Bombay between 1964 and 1985, a 2.7% increase in Shanghai 5 between 1972-1974 and 1992-1993, while a 3.6% increase is reported in Singapore between 1968 and 1992.
One reason for the incidence variation among provinces could be factors related to different environmental exposures and life styles. Breast cancer risk is associated with a high socio-economic level 4. In the United States, for instance, risk variation related to educational level or annual income can be almost completely explained by the different distribution of such factors as parity, menstruation and menopause age, obesity and alcohol consumption 4. Previous research 5 on the prevalence of risk factors in Cuba showed that over 50% of the population had a mid-level socio-economic status. The eastern provinces showed the largest proportion of people with a low socio-economic status, while Havana City had the most with a higher status. Significant differences were found among women, in terms of number of children, age at birth of the first child, proportion of women with no children, early or late menarche and menopause, number of abortions, and history of g ynecological pathologies. These differences are associated with the fact that the western and central provinces show a higher socioeconomic level, are predominantly white (a historical factor related to socio-economic status), women have their first child after 20, and they have no more than three children. Behavior of women in the eastern provinces is the opposite.
In addition, the mortality-incidence ratio is higher in the eastern provinces, except for Santiago de Cuba. This could be a factor to consider in assessing the results of the breast cancer control program in those provinces. The truncated rate for the 35-64 age groups is double that of the incidence rate, reflecting the high risk for breast cancer in these age groups.
The analysis of these results should guide specialists and decision-makers as they prioritize the cancer control program’s actions and resources for higher risk geographical regions and age groups.
1 Parkin DM, Bray FI, Devesa SS. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. European Journal of Cancer 2001; 37:4-66.
2 J.Ferlay, F. Bray, P. Pisani and D.M. Parkin. GLOBOCAN 2000: Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide, Version 1.0. IARC CancerBase No. 5. Lyon, IARCPress, 2001.
3 Parkin DM. Global cancer statistics in the year 2000. Lancet Oncol 2001; 2:533-46.
4 Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E. Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2001 Mar;2(3):133-40
5 Robles SC, Galaris E. Breast cancer in Latin America and the Caribbean. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2002 Mar;11(3):178-85.
6 Cáncer en Cuba. 1997-1998. Registro Nacional de Cáncer. Instituto Nacional de Oncología y Radiobiología, la Habana 2001, ISBN 959-7132-70-2
7 Smith B. The Breast. Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil 1996; 9(1):7-9.
8 Cuba. Estadísticas seleccionadas 2000 . Oficina Nacional de estadísticas. Marzo 2001. ISBN 959-7119-16-1
9 Van Loon J, Goldbohm A, Van Den Brandt P. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence: A prospective cohort study. Int J Epidemiol 1994;23(5):899-905.
10 Kelsey JL, Gammon MD. Epidemiology of breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 1990; 12:28-240.
11 American Institute for Cancer Research (eds). Patterns of Cancer. In: Food, Nutrition and the Prevention of Cancer: A global perspective. 1997: 35-52.
12 Parkin DM. Cancer in developing countries. Cancer Surv 1994, 19/20, 519-561.
13 Jin F, Devessa SS, Chow W, et.al. Cancer Incidence trends in urban Shanghai, 1972-1994: an update. Int J Cancer 1999, 83;435-40.
14 Karjalinen S, Pukkla E. Social class as a prognostic factor in breast cancer survival. Cancer 1990, 66;819-826
15 Heck KE, Pamuk Er. Explaining the relation between education and postmenopausal breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1997, 145:366-372
16 Lorenzo-Luaces P, Galán Y, Abascal ME. Técnicas estadísticas multivariadas en la investigación epidemiológica. Ejemplo en la prevalencia de factores de riesgo de cáncer en Cuba. Rev Cubana Oncol 1995, 11(1);55-60
1. BS in Mathematics. Head of the National Office, National Cancer Registry in Cuba.
2 . Second degree specialist in Biostatistics. Vice Director for Research. National Institute of Oncology and Radiology, Havana.
3 . First degree specialist in Oncology. National Office, National Cancer Registry.
4 . BS in Mathematics. National Office, National Cancer Registry.
5 . National Office, National Cancer Registry.